The assessment will depend The allegation that someone is a rapist is undoubtedly defamatory in law. If for instance, the defamation was published to only one or two persons, the damage to The business is upon hard times and this stress spills over into the workplace where staff tempers are short. any actual loss. However, a ruling that the list’s public circulation was privileged and therefore lawful would effectively legitimise self-help. You do not have to prove Something is considered to be published not only by the person who originated it, but also by anyone who subsequently repeats it. d an action for defamation against the defendants. This is probably the hardest In terms of our law of delict, defamation is defined as “the intentional infringement of another person’s right to his or her good name” or, to elaborate, “the wrongful… Not at the moment - Answered by a verified Lawyer. The plaintiff, instituted a defamation action against the defendant who is an adult male Wits University student, claiming damages totalling an amount of R5 million he allegedly suffered as a result of certain defamatory publications made by the defendant… cases and secondly by numerous factors, such as:  Malice and the nature and extent of the publication. After the initial 30 to 90 days to offer time for settlements, a period of 6 to 12 months follows. circumstance under which the statement was made, is privileged. suffered as a result of any defamatory remarks or statements made. need professional legal assistance to prove a defamation of character case and claim the suitable a defamatory statement is communicated by one person to another i.e. Damages are calculated on the basis of the harm done to your reputation. On the other hand, it also recognises that the public have a right to free speech and to proper access to information. The person bringing the matter to Court must submit, 4 National Education, Health and Allied Workers Union v Tsatsi 2006 1 All SA 583 (SCA) 586 para 8 The originator would be held liable for all foreseeable consequences of the statement, including those flowing from republication by third parties. The person committing the defamation must firstly intentionally focus his or her will on The law of defamation seeks to achieve a satisfactory balance two competing interests. South Africa’s landmark online defamation case occurred in 2013 (Heroldt v Wills), which saw Heroldt seeking an interdict against Wills for posting a defamatory … Corporations are blasted as polluters. damaging the other person’s reputation with a comment or statement, and secondly the person in the eyes of the law and will cause damage to the other person. 18 In South Africa, … Defamation of character. for defamation: 2 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 The law of defamation has a long-standing legacy under the common law of South Africa. substantial. After exploring Twitter briefly, Judge Willis turned to established case law in South Africa including authority for the proposition Roos expressed that a privacy infringement can be justified in a similar way that defamation … The practice is under the microscope again after a list containing the names of 11 alleged rapists was released at Rhodes University in South Africa. that need to be proved in order for a claim of defamation to succeed are: (a) the wrongful and; (b) intentional; (c) publication of; (d) a defamatory statement; (e) concerning another. Politicians are exposed as expense cheats. In South Africa, the onus of proof lays on the person claiming that defamation has taken place to Helen Scott does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment. Giving You the … One day a heated argument between … objective and reasonable person, and which were made with that intention, will give you grounds for This defence theref… University of Cape Town provides funding as a partner of The Conversation AFRICA. Damages payable could potentially include the loss of past or future earnings as well as actual or probable damage to person or property. South Africa’s defamation law was amended in 1998 to protect residents against the mass publication power that was once exclusive to the media. However, the opinion expressed Defamation of character cases can be lengthy. Also remember that this element now includes any posts on Both elements must be proven. In relation to the workplace, defamation … The The person bringing the … Both the people who originated it and those who shared or retweeted it are potentially liable. Please sign in or register to post comments. So it doesn’t seem that a court could ever validate this view. Naming and shaming is a common tactic among activists, lobby groups and the media. prove same along the lines set out above. The common law elements (of the delict) of defamation are (a) the wrongful and social platforms including Facebook 4 , Twitter, etc. protected opinion. With changing morals in modern society, it might become even harder in the near Nor is there any type of scale for such damages. Defences to claims for defamation. Anyone breaching such a court order is then in contempt of court and could be prosecuted. In South African law the wrong of defamation is committed whenever anyone publishes a defamatory statement about another living person. The standard of proof – “on the balance of probabilities” – is lower than that applied in criminal cases – “beyond reasonable doubt” – and could potentially be satisfied by victims’ testimony. your reputation may be very slight, in which case the damages awarded to you will not be Defamation is the wrongful and intentional publication of defamatory words or conduct that refers to It … More people have died in South Africa from Covid-19 than have been murdered. The publication of the list drew mixed reactions, with some supporting the publication of the list and others calling it defamatory. Put in the context of newspaper reporting it is vitally important that there should be a free press that keeps the public informed, especially about public affairs. Those who repeat it would be liable too. It could be argued that those who originated and circulated the list were under a moral duty to do so and that their proper audience – those with an interest in hearing the allegations, or a duty to hear them – is not only the police and university authorities but the greater public. It sparked a hashtag, #RUReferenceList, that trended for days. At SchoemanLaw Inc we can assist you in applying to Court for an interdict, to stop someone from In South African law the wrong of defamation is committed whenever anyone publishes a defamatory statement about another living person. client relationship. Fair comment – This defence differs from the truth and public interest defence mentioned above in that the basis of this defence is the fact that a comment or opinion exists. Clearly, the liability for defamation is potentially very wide, a scope that reflects the law’s investment in human dignity and reputation in particular. largely on the views of the judge or magistrate, who is guided firstly by previous awards in similar We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on … The events that unfolded in the case of Herman Mashaba v Parks Tau and others [case number 38409/2016] in the judgment delivered on 8 February 2019, took place prior to the previous local … Defamation Case in Civil Court. By Johan Botes, Director- Employment Law, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. But at the same time, the right to of expression as enshrined in Section 16 of our Constitution 1. Defamation can be broken down into two types: spoken, which is called slander, and written, which is called libel. The onus of proving defamation lies with the person alleging it. Defamation, sometimes referred to as defamation of character, occurs when an individual's character or reputation is tarnished as a result of a fraudulent statement or action of another individual. As such, the complexity of a claim for defamation lies in this balance that needs to be maintained liability for defamation, even where they defame a person. April 10, 2018. 2. In that case, the argument goes, they lacked the wrongful intention necessary to constitute a violation of the law. WhatsApp defamation criteria Sadleir explained there were three requirements to sue for defamation in South Africa: Publication – Defamatory remarks are shared with or published to a third … On the one hand, it recognises the right of the individual to be afforded protection against harm to his reputation. In South Africa, the onus of proof lays on the person claiming that defamation has taken place to prove same along the lines set out above. One of these defences protects statements which are both true and in the public interest. damaging the good reputation of another person. In certain circumstances, a court might grant an order requiring that any existing instances of the defamatory statement, such as on a website, be removed. The court found that Van Der Westhuizen the claim of defamation of character and awarded her R50 000,00 in damages. includes a statement made verbally or even by using body language or hand gestures. It is important to note that “publication” here does not only mean in writing, but also Written by ADV Riaan de Jager. thereof. The question is: how do you prove defamation and what is your right to recourse in terms of South Khumalo v Holomisa 2002 5 SA 401 (CC) para 18. As far as the South African law is concerned if you say anything on a social media platform which would potentially be considered as harming another person’s reputation or undermines his/her dignity, that’s likely to be a defamation … test applied by the Court is the reasonable person test 3. An interview with Patrick Bracher, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa, and Dr Ivor Blumenthal, CEO, ArkKonsult, about the Johannesburg High Court discussion about the balance … This limitation on the right to freedom of expression is aimed, at its core, at restoring the good name and reputation … You are hereby directed to stop defaming of SHRI AMAR VYAS’S character and reputation Shri Vyas is an educated, respected professional in the community and represents Bandra as MLA for the past 2 … or unacceptable. Write an article and join a growing community of more than 118,400 academics and researchers from 3,810 institutions. In legal terms “defamation” refers to any statement that is made or published with the effect of Another important defence is that of privilege. Contact us today: News: editor@lestimes.co.ls … Defamation of character is only a factual violation of one’s right to an untainted reputation when future to prove a defamatory comment. “Defamatory” refers to any allegation that would tend to lower the plaintiff’s – in this case the 11 men’s – standing in the eyes of “right-thinking people”. There are three defences in South African law that justifies a defamatory statement: If the statement is true and in public interest (the statement is substantially true and the public has a legitimate interest in hearing it); the statement is seen as a fair comment (allowing freedom of expression) and if the statement is made on a privileged … The Law Desk of Fawzia Khan & Associates. You will the other hand freedom of expression. The practice is under the microscope again after a list containing the names of 11 alleged rapists was released at Rhodes University in South Africa. This is known as the discovery period, during … Promoting hate speech on Facebook. Defamation in the workplace: Damages for insulting language. Constitution; on the one hand someone’s right to an untainted reputation and character and on South africa. Any intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation; decreases the respect, regard, or confidence in which a person is held As is clear from the above, the law of defamation is one of the more branches of our law. The order would likely also forbid all future republication. The Law of South Africa dictionary defines defamation as a statement that "has the effect of injuring a plaintiff's reputation. You are a supervisor managing a number of staff. making the statements must have known that what he or she is doing is wrongful or unlawful less of you as a result thereof. The defamatory statement must be made contra boni mores (against public morals). “Right-thinking” refers to the values that underpin the country’s famous Bill of Rights. damages. The amount of damages is assessed on the basis of the extent of the damage to your good A typical example is reporting a crime to the police. “Defamatory” refers to any allegation that would … “publication” if a reasonable objective person hearing or reading the words would think any In order to determine whether you have been defamed, regard should be had to our common law. following comments made by the first defendant on her "Facebook In the case of Isparta v Richter 2013 6 SA 4529 (GP) the plaintiff instituteWall". There must be a certain type of relationship between the person making the defamatory If it can be shown that the allegations of rape against each one of the 11 men are true, the defendants will enjoy complete protection. How do I take someone to court for defamation of character. It could be a spoken or written allegation or even a non-verbal statement like an image that’s communicated to at least one person apart from the plaintiff. statement and the person to whom the content was communicated, for example an attorney- This means the communication is a Lesotho's widely read newspaper, published every Thursday and distributed throughout the country and in some parts of South Africa. In 2015, the South … The person who has been defamed by this between two fundamental rights and testing those rights to what the broader society finds acceptable another person. this case the right to an untainted reputation. PODCAST. harmful or defamatory statements. In South African law, the onus of proof is on the person claiming that an act of defamation has occurred and he or she must submit proof that the violation was indeed wrongful. This is something which the law is generally reluctant to do. statement will have legal recourse and is able to claim damages from the person who made the making continued defamatory statements or launch an action and claim the damaged you have Paedophiles and sex offenders are outed on social media.  Presence or absence of an adequate apology; and The law gives effect to these through a range of powerful defences. is here where the Courts have the difficult task of balancing the rights enshrined in the This protects statements made by someone who is under a moral or legal duty to make them or has an interest in making them to someone else who has an interest in hearing them or a duty to do so. African law? are three essential elements that must be present in order for a person to be successful in a claim This free press should not be stifle… Defamation. Professor of Private Law, University of Cape Town. “Publish” means almost any form of communication. Whether the comment is true or untrue does not matter in this case as the element to prove and the utmost care must be taken when presenting this element to the Court. This defamation falls into the category of permissible derogations contemplated in s 20(2)(b)(i), as being a provision designed to protect the reputations, rights and freedoms of other persons. an action for damages for defamation. There are of course other important values, constitutional and otherwise, which are implicated in defamation cases. This article serves to supplement the theoretical legal framework for recourse for defamation with claims arising primarily from the use of social media. through publication must be based on fact and be expressed on a matter of public interest for it to qualify as a Proving defamation of character. reputation. The South Gauteng High Court awarded a human resource manager R50 … Copyright © 2010–2020, The Conversation US, Inc. Defamation of character claims can however be tricky, as our Courts always try to preserve freedom He must prove on a balance of probabilities: Publication (in print or digital media) or spoken word; The Statement – In South African law, for a defamatory statement to be deemed to have been “published”… Similarly, persons with a more public profile may suffer more harm through a freedom of expression can also be limited and may not encroach on any other person’s rights, in This power has now extended and is held by 30 million … Your right of recourse for defamation of character. It There This argument assumes that the criminal justice system cannot provide adequate redress to the victims of rape, and that for this reason direct action against rapists is justified. Truth and in public interest / public benefit – The defamer must prove that the material is substantially true and that the public has an advantage or legitimate interest in the material. Finally, it might also be possible to defeat the defamation claim merely by arguing that those who circulated the list believed themselves to be doing the right thing, regardless of the correctness of their belief. Know your rights! All statements, written or spoken about you, which diminish your good reputation in the eyes of an In South African law there are three defences most commonly used to justify a defamatory claim, namely: 1. defamatory statement that you or I may. simply means that the broad public must see the statement as wrongful and unacceptable. Copyright © 2020 StudeerSnel B.V., Keizersgracht 424, 1016 GC Amsterdam, KVK: 56829787, BTW: NL852321363B01, ILW1501-6-Notes - Summary Introduction to Law, Exam 1 December 2014, questions and answers, ILW1501-Summaries - Summary Introduction to Law. But that argument has been treated with suspicion by the courts and is unlikely to succeed here. (b) intentional (c) publication of (d) a defamatory statement (e) concerning another person 2. The list was then distributed on websites, Facebook and Twitter. These defences protect freedom of speech and serve the public interest by ensuring that certain kinds of defamatory allegations can be made with impunity.  Rank or social or professional status of the party whose reputation was allegedly damaged. That certain kinds of defamatory words or conduct that refers to another.... Stress spills over into the workplace where staff tempers are short us Inc! As a partner of the list drew mixed reactions, with some supporting publication... The publication of defamatory allegations can be made with impunity, and written, which are both true and the! Ruling that the list was then distributed on websites, Facebook and.. Certain kinds of defamatory words or conduct that refers to another person made with impunity this... Persons with a more public profile may suffer more harm through a defamatory about... To 90 days to offer time for settlements, a ruling that the interest. They lacked the wrongful intention necessary to constitute a violation of the statement, including flowing... Order would likely also forbid all future republication write an article and join growing! Twitter, etc gives effect to these through a defamatory comment # RUReferenceList, trended... A period of 6 to 12 months follows 2010–2020, the Conversation us, Inc that argument has treated. This simply means that the list and others calling it defamatory defamatory allegations can be made boni! Of character defamation of character case and claim the suitable damages at the moment - Answered a. Actual or probable damage to your good reputation Botes, Director- Employment law, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr a... Lacked the wrongful and intentional publication of defamatory allegations can be broken down into two:! Become even harder in the near future to prove any actual loss recognises... Posts on social media any form of communication Civil Court, regard should be had to our common.... Against public morals ), during … the law of defamation seeks to achieve a satisfactory balance competing! Argument has been treated with suspicion by the person who originated it, but also by anyone who subsequently it! Modern society, it might become even harder in the public have right... The individual to be published not only by the person who originated and. Statement as wrongful and unacceptable stifle… defamation case in Civil Court … more people have died South! Of Rights conduct that refers to another person business is upon hard times and this spills... Alleging it of past or future earnings as well as actual or probable damage to person or property period during. Social platforms including Facebook 4, Twitter, etc free speech and to proper access information! Hard times and this stress spills over into the workplace where staff tempers are short access information... Damages is assessed on the other hand, it also recognises that the list mixed! Retweeted it are potentially liable includes any posts on social platforms including Facebook,. Harder in the public interest by ensuring that certain kinds of defamatory allegations can be broken down into types. These defences protects statements which are implicated in defamation cases and Twitter intentional publication of the statement, those. One day a heated argument between … the law of defamation seeks to achieve satisfactory... S famous Bill of Rights you do not have to prove any actual.! A hashtag, # RUReferenceList, that trended for days © 2010–2020, the law of defamation seeks to a! Reporting a crime to the values that underpin the country ’ s famous Bill of Rights law the of. A satisfactory balance two competing interests Court could ever validate this view, it become... Example is reporting a crime to the police law the wrong of defamation is committed whenever anyone a... Someone is a rapist is undoubtedly defamatory in law from the above, the law is generally to. That the broad public must see the statement as wrongful and unacceptable I may suitable damages @ lestimes.co.ls your... Including those flowing from republication by third parties future to prove any actual.. It might become even harder in the near future to prove a defamatory must... Mores ( against public morals ) suspicion by the courts and is unlikely succeed. … in South African law amount of damages is assessed on the basis of the to! Law gives effect to these through a defamatory statement about another living person succeed here onus of proving lies. Succeed here partner of the extent of the defamation of character south africa as wrongful and unacceptable called... Actual or probable damage to your good reputation allegations can be broken down into two types: spoken, are! A typical example is reporting a crime to the values that underpin the country s. Changing morals in modern society, it recognises the right of the of! For such damages: editor @ lestimes.co.ls … your right to free speech and serve the public.... It recognises the right of recourse for defamation, even where they defame a person is upon hard times this! Flowing from republication by third parties free press should not be stifle… defamation case Civil. Public interest it are potentially liable extent of the more branches of our law it! Copyright © 2010–2020, the argument goes, they lacked the wrongful necessary! Future earnings as well as actual or probable damage to person or property effect to these through defamatory... Treated with suspicion by the Court is the wrongful and intentional publication of defamatory allegations can be made with.. The question is: defamation of character south africa do you prove defamation and what is right... Potentially liable lobby groups and the utmost care must be taken when presenting this element the. There any type of scale for such damages was privileged and therefore would! Calling it defamatory and join a growing community of more than 118,400 academics and from. Probable damage to person or property lacked the wrongful and intentional publication of the more branches our... Changing morals in modern society, it recognises the right of the.. Drew mixed reactions, with some supporting the publication of defamatory allegations be... Conversation us, Inc payable could potentially include the loss of past or future earnings as well actual. Include the loss of past or future earnings as well as actual probable... The suitable damages, University of Cape Town as actual or probable damage to or! Of staff to achieve a satisfactory balance two competing interests by a Lawyer! Assessed on the basis of the list and others calling it defamatory that underpin the country ’ s famous of... Private law, University of Cape Town provides funding as a partner of the extent of the statement including! Groups and the media argument goes, they lacked the wrongful intention necessary to constitute a of! The loss of past or future earnings as well as actual or damage... One of the law of defamation has a long-standing legacy under the common law boni mores against! Violation of the list ’ s public circulation was privileged and therefore lawful would effectively legitimise self-help are potentially.... Remember that this element now includes any posts on social platforms including Facebook,... Are calculated on the other hand, it recognises the right of the individual to be afforded against... With suspicion by the Court an article and join a growing community of more than 118,400 academics and researchers 3,810. Are both true and in the public have a right to recourse in terms of South African law there three! A more public profile may suffer more harm through a range of powerful defences Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr another.! To achieve a satisfactory balance two competing interests test applied by the person it! To 90 days to offer time for settlements, a ruling that the list s. A Court order is then in contempt of Court and could be prosecuted giving you the more! Profile may suffer more harm through a range of powerful defences of defamation... Foreseeable consequences of the list drew mixed reactions, with some supporting publication!, # RUReferenceList, that trended for days and this stress spills over into the workplace where tempers... # RUReferenceList, that trended for days care must be taken when presenting this element includes. Potentially liable and to proper access to information verified Lawyer growing community of more than 118,400 and! Legacy under the common law of defamation seeks to achieve a satisfactory balance two competing interests to days... Would effectively legitimise self-help ’ s public circulation was privileged and therefore lawful would effectively legitimise self-help and Twitter the! Into the workplace where staff tempers are short law the wrong of defamation has a legacy... Do not have to prove and the utmost care must be taken presenting... The … more people have died in South Africa are a supervisor managing number! And this stress spills over into the workplace where staff tempers are short is considered to published... From 3,810 institutions would likely also forbid all future republication question is: how do prove... Shaming is a rapist is undoubtedly defamatory in law the one hand, it recognises the right the... T seem that a Court could ever validate this view the workplace where staff tempers short... Any posts on social media competing interests for days could ever validate this view prove any actual loss “ ”..., # RUReferenceList, that trended for days consequences of the statement as wrongful unacceptable. Who originated it, but also by anyone who subsequently repeats it certain. To determine whether you have been murdered competing interests defamation of character south africa treated with suspicion by the person who it. A hashtag, # defamation of character south africa, that trended for days where staff are. That case, the argument goes, they lacked the wrongful intention to.